Trade-Offs in Cryptographic Implementations of Temporal Access Control
نویسنده
چکیده
In recent years, we have seen the development of key assignment schemes that use cryptography to enforce time-based authorization policies. One of the most important aspects of these schemes is the balance between the time required to derive keys and the amount of storage required for the public information from which keys are derived. The derivation time and storage are dependent on the number of time periods used in the authorization policy. In this paper, we discuss novel schemes that achieve good trade-offs between these competing parameters and for which explicit bounds can be given in terms of the number of time periods.
منابع مشابه
Exploiting Cryptographic Architectures over Hardware Vs. Software Implementations: Advantages and Trade-Offs
Cryptographic modules can be implemented in both hardware and software. Although software cryptographic implementations are cost-effective and more flexible, they seem to provide a much lower level of security in relation to their hardware equivalents. The uncontrolled memory access, the vulnerabilities imposed by the OS and the facility of modifying software implementations are some of the sec...
متن کاملStream ciphers and the eSTREAM project
Stream ciphers are an important class of symmetric cryptographic algorithms. The eSTREAM project contributed significantly to the recent increase of activity in this field. In this paper, we present a survey of the eSTREAM project. We also review recent time/memory/data and time/memory/key trade-offs relevant for the generic attacks on stream ciphers.
متن کاملCoronavirus: Where Has All the Health Economics Gone?
As the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues to unfold there is an untold number of trade-offs being made in every country around the globe. The experience in the United Kingdom and Canada to date has not seen much uptake of health economics methods. We provide some thoughts on how this could take place, specifically in three areas. Firstly, this can involve understanding the i...
متن کاملEthical Perspective: Five Unacceptable Trade-offs on the Path to Universal Health Coverage
This article discusses what ethicists have called “unacceptable trade-offs” in health policy choices related to universal health coverage (UHC). Since the fiscal space is constrained, trade-offs need to be made. But some trade-offs are unacceptable on the path to universal coverage. Unacceptable choices include, among other examples from low-income countries, to expand coverage for services wit...
متن کاملDefining Pathways and Trade-offs Toward Universal Health Coverage; Comment on “Ethical Perspective: Five Unacceptable Trade-offs on the Path to Universal Health Coverage”
The World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) World Health Report 2010, “Health systems financing, the path to universal coverage,” promoted universal health coverage (UHC) as an aspirational objective for country health systems. Yet, in addition to the dimensions of services and coverage, distribution of coverage in the population, and financial risk protection highlighted by the report, the conside...
متن کامل